TQQQ vs XLV Overlap

Comparing ProShares UltraPro QQQ and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund

Holdings Overlap
4.71%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
8 of 60
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

TQQQ
XLV
4.7%
TQQQ Only
Overlap
XLV Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

TQQQ Return
+24.24%
XLV Return
+14.93%
Winner
TQQQ
+9.31%
Max Drawdown
TQQQ: -23.0%
XLV: -5.6%
TQQQ Volatility (annualized)47.74%
XLV Volatility (annualized)13.94%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
TQQQ
XLV
1 Year Return
+85.5%โœ“
+12.5%
3 Year Return
+18.5%โœ“
+6.8%
5 Year Return
+42.5%โœ“
+11.2%
Volatility
68.50%
15.80%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.86%
0.10%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
TQQQ
XLV
Volatility
68.50%
15.80%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.58
0.68โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.72
0.95โœ“
Max Drawdown
-82.50%
-25.20%โœ“
Beta
3.00
0.72

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

9 - 9

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
TQQQ:0.86%โœ“
vs
XLV:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
TQQQ:101 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLV:64 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
TQQQ:+42.5%โœ“
vs
XLV:+11.2%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
TQQQ: 31.4% in top 10โœ“
XLV: 57.5% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
TQQQ: $20B
XLV: $35Bโœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
TQQQ: 0.58
XLV: 0.68
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
TQQQ: 68.5%
XLV: 15.8%โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
TQQQ: 48.3% unique
XLV: 90.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: TQQQ and XLV are very similar. Choose based on your broker's commission structure or personal preference.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

8 shared holdings representing 4.7% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockTQQQ WeightXLV WeightOverlap
1
ISRG
ISRG
0.71%3.67%0.71%
2
AMGN
AMGN
0.63%3.10%0.63%
3
GILD
GILD
0.54%2.72%0.54%
4
VRTX
VRTX
0.41%2.06%0.41%
5
REGN
REGN
0.28%1.29%0.28%
6
IDXX
IDXX
0.20%1.03%0.20%
7
GEHC
GEHC
0.13%0.70%0.13%
8
DXCM
DXCM
0.09%0.48%0.09%

Overlap by Sector

Healthcare
4 stocks ยท 2.29% overlap
Other
4 stocks ยท 0.70% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

8
Shared Stocks
4.7%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in TQQQ

Unique to TQQQ

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA5.63%
AAPLAAPL5.05%
MSFTMSFT4.54%
AMZNAMZN3.08%
TSLATSLA2.72%

Top Holdings Only in XLV

Unique to XLV

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
LLYLLY14.33%
JNJJNJ8.84%
ABBVABBV7.23%
UNHUNH5.38%
MRKMRK4.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs