JEPI vs XLV: Complete Comparison
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: JEPI and XLV are very similar. Choose based on your broker's commission structure or personal preference.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
14 shared holdings representing 14.3% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | JEPI Weight | XLV Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JNJ JNJ | 1.63% | 8.84% | 1.63% |
| 2 | ABBV ABBV | 1.62% | 7.23% | 1.62% |
| 3 | MDT MDT | 1.34% | 2.34% | 1.34% |
| 4 | SYK SYK | 1.27% | 2.21% | 1.27% |
| 5 | BMY BMY | 1.09% | 1.89% | 1.09% |
| 6 | REGN REGN | 0.97% | 1.29% | 0.97% |
| 7 | LLY LLY | 0.96% | 14.33% | 0.96% |
| 8 | DHR DHR | 0.89% | 2.61% | 0.89% |
| 9 | MRK MRK | 0.83% | 4.44% | 0.83% |
| 10 | VRTX VRTX | 0.60% | 2.06% | 0.60% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in JEPI
Unique to JEPI
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | GOOGL | 1.67% |
| MGMXX | MGMXX | 1.62% |
| ADI | ADI | 1.56% |
| AMZN | AMZN | 1.55% |
| MA | MA | 1.55% |
Top Holdings Only in XLV
Unique to XLV
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| TMO | TMO | 3.90% |
| ABT | ABT | 3.87% |
| ISRG | ISRG | 3.67% |
| AMGN | AMGN | 3.10% |
| GILD | GILD | 2.72% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.