ITOT vs XLV Overlap AnalysisOverlap
Comparing iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ ITOT wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: ITOT wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider ITOT for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
56 shared holdings representing 8.3% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | ITOT Weight | XLV Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LLY LLY | 1.16% | 14.33% | 1.16% |
| 2 | JNJ JNJ | 0.68% | 8.84% | 0.68% |
| 3 | ABBV ABBV | 0.58% | 7.23% | 0.58% |
| 4 | UNH UNH | 0.44% | 5.38% | 0.44% |
| 5 | MRK MRK | 0.33% | 4.44% | 0.33% |
| 6 | TMO TMO | 0.33% | 3.90% | 0.33% |
| 7 | ABT ABT | 0.33% | 3.87% | 0.33% |
| 8 | ISRG ISRG | 0.31% | 3.67% | 0.31% |
| 9 | AMGN AMGN | 0.26% | 3.10% | 0.26% |
| 10 | BSX BSX | 0.23% | 2.52% | 0.23% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in ITOT
Unique to ITOT
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVDA | 7.33% |
| AAPL | AAPL | 6.04% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 5.68% |
| AMZN | AMZN | 3.64% |
| GOOGL | GOOGL | 2.55% |
Top Holdings Only in XLV
Unique to XLV
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UHS | UHS | 0.23% |
| ALGN | ALGN | 0.20% |
| CRL | CRL | 0.17% |
| DVA | DVA | 0.08% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.