DIA vs XLF Overlap

Comparing SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

Holdings Overlap
10.76%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
2 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

DIA
XLF
10.8%
DIA Only
Overlap
XLF Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

DIA Return
+9.12%
XLF Return
+6.68%
Winner
DIA
+2.44%
Max Drawdown
DIA: -5.1%
XLF: -5.6%
DIA Volatility (annualized)10.72%
XLF Volatility (annualized)13.17%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
DIA
XLF
1 Year Return
+22.8%
+28.5%โœ“
3 Year Return
+8.5%
+10.5%โœ“
5 Year Return
+13.2%
+14.8%โœ“
Volatility
17.50%โœ“
21.50%
Expense Ratio
0.16%
0.10%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
DIA
XLF
Volatility
17.50%โœ“
21.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.71โœ“
0.65
Sortino Ratio
1.02โœ“
0.88
Max Drawdown
-36.80%โœ“
-55.20%
Beta
0.92
1.12

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

4 - 11

๐Ÿ† XLF wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
DIA:0.16%โœ“
vs
XLF:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
DIA:30 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLF:68 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
DIA:+13.2%
vs
XLF:+14.8%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
DIA: 65.1% in top 10
XLF: 55.7% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
DIA: $35B
XLF: $40Bโœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
DIA: 0.71
XLF: 0.65
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
DIA: 17.5%โœ“
XLF: 21.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
DIA: 89.5% uniqueโœ“
XLF: 86.3% unique

Bottom line: XLF wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider XLF for your portfolio, but DIA is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

2 shared holdings representing 10.8% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockDIA WeightXLF WeightOverlap
1
V
Visa Inc
5.65%7.26%5.65%
2
GS
Goldman Sachs
8.25%3.47%3.47%

Overlap by Sector

Financials
2 stocks ยท 9.12% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

2
Shared Stocks
10.8%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in DIA

Unique to DIA

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
UNHUnitedHealth Group9.85%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.85%
HDHome Depot6.65%
CATCaterpillar Inc6.25%
AMGNAmgen Inc5.85%

Top Holdings Only in XLF

Unique to XLF

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B11.80%
JPMJPM10.82%
MAMA5.81%
BACBAC4.78%
WFCWFC3.73%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs